Drawing for STARCRAFT

USPTO serial 79056978

STARCRAFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3696079Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 13, 2009
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with STARCRAFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherry L. Rollo

Sherry L. Rollo Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP200 West MadisonSuite 2700CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Cutters being parts of machines, namely, mill cutters, gear cutters, hole cutters, router bits; cutting tools being parts of machines for cutting wood, metal, glass, rock, and other hard materials, namely, power drill bits, power drill bits for wood, power drill bits for metal, power drill bits for rock, power screwdriver bits, hole cutters, saw blades, rotary carbide burrs; thread processing cutters, namely, thread mills, thread milling cutters, taps being parts of metal cutting machines and dies for use with machine tools; spot facing machines cutters, namely, milling cutters, power drill bits, hole cutters being parts of machines; power operated drill machines; cutting machines; lathe tools; reciprocating saws; gear processing cutters; broaching cuttersACTIVE—
008Abrasives being hand tools, namely, files, pads, namely, sanding pads for non-electric, hand-operated sanders, and blocks, namely, sanding blocks all for metal, masonry, stone and stainless steel; hand tools, namely, manually-operated emery grinding wheels, needle files, planers, drills, hand saws, screw wrenches; drill bits for hand drills; hand-operated cutting tools, namely, cutting pliers; hand saw blades being parts of hand tools, namely, hacksaw blades, scroll saw blades; gimlets; handsaw frames; blades for planersACTIVE—
009Gauges, namely, level gauges, pressure gauges, length measuring gauges, depth gauges, namely, cross beam depth measuring gauges, thread gauges, namely, screw thread measuring gauges, feeler gauges, namely, gauges for measuring the width of gaps, hole gauges, namely, gauges for measuring the size of holes, micron dial indicator, namely, dial bore indicator, dial depth indicator, dial thickness indictor, dial test indicator, dial pipe indicator, internal dial caliper indicator and electronic digital indicator all being instruments for measuring length; angular measuring tools, namely, protractors, sextants, center gauge, adjustable angular gauge; gear measuring tools, namely, length measuring gauges, depth measuring gauges for measuring tire tread depth, depth measuring gauges for measuring cross beam depth, resistance measuring instruments; measuring tools for cutters, namely, length measuring gauges, depth measuring gauges for measuring tire tread depth, depth measuring gauges for measuring cross beam depth, resistance measuring instruments; slide calipers; micrometer calipersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 8, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 17, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 5, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 5, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 23, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 13, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 23, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 11, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 11, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance