Drawing for NAUTILUX

USPTO serial 79057043

NAUTILUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAUTILUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Boats, bicycles, scootersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
014key ringsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
016Paper, cardboard, cardboard packaging, stationerySECTION 70 - CANCELLED
018Travelling bags, sea bags, beauty cases, make-up bagsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
024Towels, beach towelsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
025Sweatshirts, fleece clothing, T-shirts, polo shirts, jackets, caps, bathrobes, slippers, foulards, ties, belts, leather beltsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 7, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 11, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 26, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 2, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 7, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 7, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 4, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 4, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 7, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 7, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 7, 2009ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 7, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Mar 26, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 5, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 3, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 9, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 9, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 9, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 5, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 4, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance