USPTO serial 79057102
DENIWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3740147Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 19, 2010
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENIWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT P MICHAL
ROBERT P MICHAL Carter DeLuca Farrell & Schmidt, LLP445 Broad Hollow RoadMelville, NY 11747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Conveying machinery; conveying machinery components, namely, roller elements for conveyor belts, roller conveyor belts and chain conveyor belts, namely, machine components and structural parts containing rolls for roller conveyors and for conveyor belts and for drives for conveyor installations, in the nature of rolls, rollers, roller bearings and roller conveyors; conveying machinery components, namely, deflection elements and deflection devices for conveyor belts and chain conveyor belts, namely, deflectors, guide tracks, construction elements and machine parts for deflecting goods and for deflecting conveyors and conveyor elements, in the nature of rolls, rollers, roller bearings, deflectors, recirculating roller bearings, and roller conveyors; conveying machinery components, namely, guiding devices for rollers in roller elements, namely, guide tracks, guard rails, chain guides, carriers, namely, carrier belts and carrier rollers, guide rolls, guides, bar guides, belt guides; conveying machinery components, namely, roller elements for mechanical storing, conveying and deflection of moved or to be moved objects, namely, machine components and structural parts containing rolls for roller conveyors and for conveyor belts and for drives for conveyor installations, rolls and rollers; drives for conveyor installations with roller elements | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electronic apparatus for operating conveyor installations and conveyor equipment, for measuring and controlling the quantity and quality of goods to be conveyed; computers and electronic control devices for controlling the handling processes of goods to be conveyed; electrical controllers for conveyor installations, computer software for controlling conveyor installations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | [ Ground vehicles, namely, land vehicles, all-terrain vehicles, armored vehicles; land, all-terrain, armored vehicles for conveying and manipulating objects, in particular printed products; all aforementioned vehicles in particular with an undercarriage including roller elements ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Technical consultancy for the design of conveyor installations and of processing conveyor installations; development and design of conveyor installations and of processing conveyor installations; development and design of components for conveyor installations and processing conveyor installations ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WRH Walter Reist Holding AG
- Other trademarks owned by WRH Walter Reist Holding AG
- Other trademarks owned by WRH Walter Reist Holding AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DENIWAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 26, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |