USPTO serial 79057112
CHANTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3689534Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 29, 2009
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CHANTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHANTY SPITZENFABRIK; GMBH & CO. KG
RÖDERMARK, DE
Other trademarks owned by CHANTY SPITZENFABRIK; GMBH & CO. KG
CHANTY SPITZENFABRIK; GMBH & CO. KG
RÖDERMARK, DE
Other trademarks owned by CHANTY SPITZENFABRIK; GMBH & CO. KG
CHANTY SPITZENFABRIK; GMBH & CO. KG
RÃDERMARK, DE
Other trademarks owned by CHANTY SPITZENFABRIK; GMBH & CO. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mari-Elise Paul
Mari-Elise Paul McBrayer PLLC500 West Jefferson Street, Suite 2400Louisville, KY 40202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Lace | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHANTY SPITZENFABRIK; GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by CHANTY SPITZENFABRIK; GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by CHANTY SPITZENFABRIK; GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named CHANTY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 1, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| May 1, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |