Drawing for LODGER

USPTO serial 79057149

LODGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3749908Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 16, 2010
Examiner
PHAM, LANA H
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LODGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Sacoff

Robert W. Sacoff PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS200 S. WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Sleeping bags for babies, cradles, carry cots and baby baskets, namely, bassinets, walking frames, namely, baby walkers and playpensSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
024Textiles fabric window coverings and treatments, namely, window valances, curtains, textile wall hangings, towels, wash cloths, fabric diaper stackers, crib canopies, crib bumper pads, nondisposable diaper changing pads not of paper, and mattress covers, and textile goods for babies, not mentioned in other classes, namely, blanket that looks like a cape and is used for wrapping a baby, bed blankets, and bed coverings in the nature of bed linens, duvet covers, bed shams, bed skirts, bed sheets, pillow cases, crib sheets, comforters, quilts, mattress covers, mattress pads, waterproof bed padsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
025Baby clothes, namely, bodysuits, tops; baby shoes, baby headwear, baby bibs not of paperSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 7, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 13, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 13, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 23, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 23, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 15, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 16, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 10, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 16, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 16, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 4, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 23, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2009GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Aug 31, 2009GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 29, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 7, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 28, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 6, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 6, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance