USPTO serial 79057152
CUPIDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CUPIDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Seeds, seedlings, natural live plants, flowers and other plant material which are suitable only for the cultivation and growth of Spathiphyllum | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 13, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |