USPTO serial 79057208
TECDOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3705460Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 3, 2009
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- —
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TECDOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard S. MacMillan
Richard S. MacMillan MACMILLAN, SOBANSKI & TODD, LLC720 WATER STREET1 MARITIME PLAZA, 5TH FLOORTOLEDO, OH 43604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Computer software for database management recorded on data carriers of all kinds, for use in the field of business management for the automotive industry ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Compilation and systemization of information into databanks in the field of business management in the automotive industry; providing business management information from an online computer database featuring information about spare parts in the field of the automotive industry; commercial information agencies; business investigations; [ conducting business inquiries for others; ] business information in the field of business management in the automotive industry [ ; business management consultation; management of business projects for others, namely, managing the trade transactions of industrial and commercial enterprises; business consultation services, namely, negotiation of the contracts concerning the purchase and sale of goods, namely, in the field of automotive industry ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Computer programming for others; computer software design for others; updating of computer software, computer hardware and software consultation; ] rental of computer software [ ; recovery of computer data; maintenance of computer software; and computer systems analysis ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TecAlliance GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by TECDOC Informations System GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by TECDOC Informations System GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TECDOC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 20, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |