Drawing for EXCELLENCE BY DESIGN

USPTO serial 79057216

EXCELLENCE BY DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3654949Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 14, 2009
Examiner
SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXCELLENCE BY DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher K. Larus

Christopher K. Larus Robins Kaplan LLP800 LaSalle Avenue2800 LaSalle PlazaMinneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Air conditioning apparatus; water heaters for heating pools; electric space heater and air cooling apparatus; solar collectors; water heaters; heat exchangers; heat pumps; heating installations; water purification installations; sewage purification installations; all of the aforesaid goods identified herein being powered by thermal solar energySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 7, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 15, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 25, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 19, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 19, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 15, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 14, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 21, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 16, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 27, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 27, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 23, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 23, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance