Drawing for POWER BET

USPTO serial 79057290

POWER BET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3752400Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 23, 2010
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWER BET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven A. Caloiaro

Steven A. Caloiaro Dickinson Wright PLLC8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200Las Vegas, NV 89113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic gaming and betting machines, namely, calibrated pay-out gaming machines; gaming and betting systems, namely, components for electronic gaming machines, namely, controllers, displays, button panels, bolsters, electrical wiring, and computer hardware and software associated therewith; Internet games, namely, downloadable electronic games via the Internet; downloadable electronic games for mobile phones; computer software for interactive reel and slot gamesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Organization and provision of gambling, wagering, poker, skill-based games, card game and casino tournaments, competitions, contests and games including those which are land-based and those provided by means of the internet, namely, providing online electronic games or on-line electronic video gamesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 13, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 10, 2017RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 16, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 30, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 24, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 16, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 9, 2015RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 11, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 23, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 11, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 13, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 13, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 13, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 13, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 23, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 23, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance