USPTO serial 79057292
SGF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 4, 2010
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SGF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SGF Süddeutsche Gelenkscheibenfabrik; GmbH & Co. KG
84478 Waldkraiburg, DE
Other trademarks owned by SGF Süddeutsche Gelenkscheibenfabrik; GmbH & Co. KG
SGF Süddeutsche Gelenkscheibenfabrik; GmbH & Co. KG
Waldkraiburg, DE
Other trademarks owned by SGF Süddeutsche Gelenkscheibenfabrik; GmbH & Co. KG
Süddeutsche Gelenkscheibenfabrik GmbH &Co. KG
Waldkraiburg, DE
Other trademarks owned by Süddeutsche Gelenkscheibenfabrik GmbH &Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY J PITZER
GARY J PITZER RENNER, OTTO, BOISELLE & SKLAR LLP1621 Euclid Avenue19th FloorCLEVELAND, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and parts therefor, namely, flexible discs for use in flexible couplings for drive lines and drive shafts of machines, oscillation dampers, [ rubber-metal parts for use in bearing assemblies comprising bearings, bearing shells, nuts, screws, tension plates for use in drive trains and drive shafts for vehicles and machines, other than for land vehicles, couplings for machines, namely, plate couplings, articulated couplings, gear couplings; ] steering flexible discs for use in the drive lines and drive shafts of machines; machine parts, namely, cardan shaft intermediate bearings, centering sleeves, driving flexible discs for use in the drive lines and drive shafts of machines, [ pendulum dampers, ] gear dampers, crank shaft dampers, suspension and mounting devices for exhaust dampers, namely, hangers for exhaust systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | [ Land vehicles, motor vehicles and parts therefor ] * parts of land and motor vehicles *, namely, flexible discs for use in flexible couplings for vehicle drive lines and drive shafts, oscillation dampers, rubber-metal parts for use in bearing assemblies comprising bearings, bearing shells, nuts, screws, tension plates for use in vehicle drive trains and drive shafts for land vehicles, couplings for vehicles, namely, [ plate couplings, articulated couplings, ] suspension systems for land and motor vehicles, namely, exhaust suspension devices; steering dampers, gear shift dampers, steering flexible discs for use in vehicle drive trains and drive shafts; axle bearings for land and motor vehicles, namely, cardan shaft intermediate bearings; steering, suspension, drive and exhaust systems and parts therefor, namely, centering sleeves, driving flexible discs, [ pendulum dampers, ] gear dampers, crank shaft dampers included in this class; all the aforesaid goods exclusively for land vehicles and motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SGF Süddeutsche Gelenkscheibenfabrik; GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by SGF Süddeutsche Gelenkscheibenfabrik; GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Süddeutsche Gelenkscheibenfabrik GmbH &Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SGF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |