USPTO serial 79057297
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
KEITH E. DANISH HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLPSEVEN TIMES SQUARENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Locks, cylinder locks, padlocks, keys, door hinges, metallic gates, doors and shutters, door handles of metal, anti-panic handles, non-electric door closers, non-electric door openers, hinges of metal, armoured doors, bolts, bolts (locks), closures of metal for containers, doors of metal, door fittings of metal, door knockers, non-electric door springs, stops of metal, knobs of metal, latches of metal, locks of metal for vehicles, metal chains for use with key rings, pins (hardware), spring locks, door stops of metal, window stops of metal; common metals and their alloys; metal building materials; transportable buildings of metal; materials of metal for railway tracks; non-electric cables and wires of common metal; ironmongery, small items of metal hardware; pipes and tubes of metal; safes; goods of common metal not included in other classes; ores | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electric locks, electrical and electronic apparatus for doors and gates, radio controllers, transmitters, video cameras, safety devices, electric apparatus for use in operating gates, shutters and doors; electric door closers, electric door openers, encoded cards, magnetic encoders, magnets; scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signalling, checking (supervision), life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; magnetic data carriers, recording discs; automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating machines and data processing equipment and computers; fire-extinguishing apparatus | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 28, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 25, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |