Drawing for FIAM

USPTO serial 79057297

FIAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

KEITH E. DANISH HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLPSEVEN TIMES SQUARENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Locks, cylinder locks, padlocks, keys, door hinges, metallic gates, doors and shutters, door handles of metal, anti-panic handles, non-electric door closers, non-electric door openers, hinges of metal, armoured doors, bolts, bolts (locks), closures of metal for containers, doors of metal, door fittings of metal, door knockers, non-electric door springs, stops of metal, knobs of metal, latches of metal, locks of metal for vehicles, metal chains for use with key rings, pins (hardware), spring locks, door stops of metal, window stops of metal; common metals and their alloys; metal building materials; transportable buildings of metal; materials of metal for railway tracks; non-electric cables and wires of common metal; ironmongery, small items of metal hardware; pipes and tubes of metal; safes; goods of common metal not included in other classes; oresSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Electric locks, electrical and electronic apparatus for doors and gates, radio controllers, transmitters, video cameras, safety devices, electric apparatus for use in operating gates, shutters and doors; electric door closers, electric door openers, encoded cards, magnetic encoders, magnets; scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signalling, checking (supervision), life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; magnetic data carriers, recording discs; automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating machines and data processing equipment and computers; fire-extinguishing apparatusSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 27, 2018LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 16, 2018LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 22, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 11, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 11, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 28, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 14, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 14, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 13, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 26, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 16, 2010ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2010LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 7, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 25, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 23, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 31, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 29, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 27, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance