Drawing for THE GREENERY

USPTO serial 79057355

THE GREENERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3696080Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 13, 2009
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with THE GREENERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Catherine Merz

Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.408 MADISON STREET, SUITE AOak Park, IL 60302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031fresh [ fruits and ] vegetables[ ; fresh, raw and unprocessed mushrooms ]ACTIVE—
035Mediation of commercial transactions for others, namely, mediation of commercial business for buying and selling, as well as the import and export of [ grains, seeds, ] fresh [ fruits and ] vegetables[, and natural plants and flowers ]; mediation of commercial business transactions for others concerning the trade of fresh [ fruits and ] vegetables [ and mushrooms ]; marketing, namely, business marketing services, business marketing consulting services, conducting marketing studies; business communication, namely, advertising through all public communication means; advertising and promotion; [ services of a vegetables and fruit auction, namely, arranging and conducting auction sales of vegetables and fruit, online auction services featuring vegetables and fruit; ] the aforementioned services also rendered within the frameworks of a retail trade business and/or a wholesale businessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 13, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 22, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 22, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 9, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 16, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 11, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 6, 2017RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 19, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 4, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Sep 10, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Sep 10, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Sep 4, 2014RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2014RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2014RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 15, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 13, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 24, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 13, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 17, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance