USPTO serial 79057363
KGW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3683287Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 15, 2009
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with KGW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minato-Ku; Tokyo, JP
Minato-Ku; Tokyo, JP
Minato-Ku; Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles Weigell
Charles Weigell Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd Street, 17th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Grinding tools for grinding machines; machine parts, namely, a grinding tool used in semiconductor wafer processing machines; [machine parts, namely, a grinding tool for photo mask glass substrate grinding machines;] machine parts, namely, a grinding tool for stone working machines; machine parts, namely, a grinding tool for rubber product working machines; machine parts, namely, a grinding tool for woodworking machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kure Grinding Wheel Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Kure Grinding Wheel Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Kure Grinding Wheel Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named KGW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 31, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 21, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |