USPTO serial 79057413
LUUVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUUVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Singapore, SG
Singapore, SG
Singapore, SG
GB
SG
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Luggage; bags, namely, bags for sport, baby carrying bags, baby changing bags, namely, bags for carrying babyies' necessities and accessories, textile bags for shopping, hiking bags, gym bags, shoe bags for travel, garment bags for travel, school bags, shaving bags sold empty, bags for umbrellas and book bags; holdalls; baggage, namely, trunks and suitcases; attaché cases; backpacks; golf bag covers; toiletry bags sold empty; beach bags; belt bags; briefcases; luggage and bags for children; golf bags (other than adapted or shaped); travel cases for travel kits sold empty; casual bags, namely, canvas bags for casual use and carrying general items; cosmetic bags and cases, sold empty; duffel bags; flight bags, namely, travel bags; garment bags for travel; handbags; hat boxes for travel, not of paper or cardboard; key cases; leather articles not included in other classes, namely, straps for luggage and belts for bags, leather belts for clothing, key cases made principally of leather; overnight bags; rucksacks; shoe bags for travel; travel bags; trunks; unfitted vanity cases; wallets; credit card cases; covers made of leather used to cover diaries; business card cases; wash bags for carrying toiletries; umbrellas; parasols | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Toy luggage and bags, namely, bags for carrying sporting articles, fishing bags, ski bags, surfboard bags, skateboard bags, bowling ball bags, cricket bags, basketball bags, baseball bags, golf club gags, tennis bags and luggage for use by children as playthings | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lee, Paul Tee Hui
- Other trademarks owned by Lee, Marc Tee Huang
- Other trademarks owned by Lee, Siang Eng
- Other trademarks owned by Paul Tee Hui LEE
- Other trademarks owned by Marc Tee Huang LEE
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named LUUVO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 7, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 27, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |