USPTO serial 79057421
MATO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3699075Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 20, 2009
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MATO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MATO Maschinen- und Metallwarenfabrik Curt Matthaei GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by MATO Maschinen- und Metallwarenfabrik Curt Matthaei GmbH & Co. KG
MATO Maschinen- und Metallwarenfabrik Curt Matthaei GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by MATO Maschinen- und Metallwarenfabrik Curt Matthaei GmbH & Co. KG
Mühlheim am Main, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven L. Underwood
Steven L. Underwood Price Heneveld LLP695 Kenmoor SE, PO Box 2567Grand Rapids, MI 49501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Conveyor and drive belt fasteners made primarily of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Machines for fastening drive and conveyor belts, namely, belt lacers and hammer installation machines; machines for assembling drive and conveyor belt rods; belt tensioning machines; belt planning machines; band cutting machines and machines to prevent the band from undulating; pneumatic pumps; power operated lubricating pumps; power operated grease guns | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand operated lubricating pumps; hand operated grease guns; hand tools for fastening drive and conveyor belts, namely, manual belt lacing machines, hammer fastener installation tools, belt skivers, screw pin insertion tools, hammer drive pins, wave and bow stops, belt markers, belt knives, belt marking pins, wire cutters, hand belt skivers and clamp-on handles for handling belts; hand operated belt tensioners, belt planes, band cutters and tools used to prevent the band from undulating | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | High pressure flexible pipes not of metal; synthetic material armored pipes and armored hoses not of metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MATO Maschinen- und Metallwarenfabrik Curt Matthaei GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by MATO Maschinen- und Metallwarenfabrik Curt Matthaei GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by MATO GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named MATO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 22, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |