Drawing for XIANYE

USPTO serial 79057435

XIANYE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3754826Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 2, 2010
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XIANYE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Chelsea VanderWoude

Chelsea VanderWoude GROSSMAN, TUCKER, PERREAULT & PFLEGER, PLLC55 South Commercial StreetManchester, NH 03101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Textile washing machines for industrial purposes; brewing machines for brewing beer; apparatus for drawing up beer under pressure, namely, pressure switches and sensors for monitoring, controlling and switching hydraulic pneumatic systems sold as integrated component of injection molding machines; hydraulic presses for metalworking; hydraulic pumps; hydraulic valve actuators; heat exchangers being parts of machines; machine tools used for overturning wheat and cleaning malt; fodder cutting machines, namely, feed cutters; drying machines for heating and drying cereals; electromechanical machines for food preparations, namely, electric food blenders, electric food choppers and electric food processorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 3, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 18, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 25, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 2, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 26, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 11, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 25, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 9, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 19, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 29, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 17, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance