USPTO serial 79057599
EBABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EBABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | CHILDREN'S PUSH CHAIRS, FOLDING OR NON-FOLDING PUSH CHAIRS, CHILDREN'S SAFETY SEATS FOR VEHICLES | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Children's furniture, in particular high chairs for meals, cradles, beds for children, tables, baby-changing tables | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | RETAIL AND ONLINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES, WHOLESALE AND ONLINE WHOLESALE STORE SERVICES, MAIL ORDER CATALOGUE SERVICES, AND SERVICES CONSISTING OF THE BRINGING TOGETHER, FOR THE BENEFIT OF OTHERS, OF A VARIETY OF GOODS, EXCLUDING THE TRANSPORT THEREOF, ENABLING CONSUMERS TO CONVENIENTLY VIEW AND PURCHASE THE SAID GOODS, All OF THE FOREGOING FEATURING BLEACHING PREPARATIONS AND OTHER SUBSTANCES FOR LAUNDRY USE, CLEANING, POLISHING, SCOURING AND ABRASIVE PREPARATIONS, SOAPS, PERFUMERY, ESSENTIAL OILS, COSMETICS, HAIR LOTIONS, DENTIFRICES, COSMETICS FOR CHILDREN, DIETETIC FOODS AND FOOD FOR CHILDREN, APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMISSION OR REPRODUCTION OF SOUND OR IMAGES, AUDIO AND VIDEO ARTICLES FOR CHILDREN, RADIOS FOR HEARING BABIES, WEIGHING AND MEASURING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, SANITARY ITEMS, NAMELY BREAST PUMPS, BABIES' FEEDING BOTTLES, DUMMIES FOR BABIES, THERMOMETERS, ORTHOPAEDIC ARTICLES, APPARATUS FOR LIGHTING, HEATING, STEAM GENERATION, COOKING, REFRIGERATING, DRYING, VENTILATING, WATER SUPPLY AND SANITARY PURPOSES, CHILDREN'S PUSH CHAIRS, FOLDING AND NON-FOLDING PUSH CHAIRS, SAFETY SEATS FOR CHILDREN, PAPER, CARDBOARD AND BOOKBINDING MATERIAL, PHOTOGRAPHS, STATIONERY, ADHESIVES FOR STATIONERY OR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES, ARTISTS' MATERIAL, PAINTBRUSHES, TYPEWRITERS AND OFFICE REQUISITES, INSTRUCTIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIAL NOT BEING APPARATUS, PLASTIC MATERIALS FOR PACKAGING, PRINTING TYPE, PRINTING BLOCKS, INFANTS' NAPPIES, CHILDREN'S FURNITURE, IN PARTICULAR HIGH CHAIRS FOR MEALS, CRADLES, BEDS FOR CHILDREN, TABLES, BABY-CHANGING TABLES, UTENSILS, CONTAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD OR KITCHEN USE THAT ARE NEITHER OF PRECIOUS METALS NOR COATED THEREWITH, COMBS AND SPONGES, BRUSHES, BRUSH-MAKING MATERIALS, ARTICLES FOR CLEANING PURPOSES, STEEL WOOL, UNWORKED OR SEMI-WORKED GLASS EXCEPT GLASS USED IN BUILDING, GLASSWARE, PORCELAIN AND EARTHENWARE, ITEMS OF CLOTHING FOR CHILDREN, FOOTWEAR, HATS, GAMES, TOYS, SWINGS, SPORTING AND GYMNASTIC ARTICLES, BEERS, MINERAL AND AERATED WATERS AND OTHER NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES, SYRUPS AND OTHER PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 1, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |