USPTO serial 79057635
SEOMETRIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEOMETRIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Professional business consultancy, organization consultancy and advertising consultancy in connection with analysis and optimization of search engines on the Internet; advertising and marketing via search engines on the Internet; planning and devising of advertising strategies on the Internet; arranging conclusion of contracts for third parties, in particular via the Internet; providing of addresses for advertising purposes and for conclusion of contracts, in particular via the Internet | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Providing platforms and portals on the Internet; providing access to information on the Internet; forwarding of news of all kinds to Internet addresses (web messaging); electronic transmission of news | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Analysis and optimization of search engines on the Internet as technological and scientific services; providing of a search engine; technical consultancy and technological services with regard to the operation, the analysis and the optimization of search engines on the Internet, as well as technical consultancy and technological services with regard to the technical provision of advertising and the marketing via search engines on the Internet; providing and renting electronic web-space on the Internet, design of homepages and web-sides (web design); carrying out of linking of Internet pages for third parties, in particular in connection with search engines; Analysis and optimization of search engines on the Internet; namely compiling and entering of information relevant for search engines and/or of registration and link texts in search engines as well as after all notification of Internet pages in web-catalogues | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |