USPTO serial 79057679
LAUNCH!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAUNCH!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management; administrative services; services of a firm consulting in the field of organisation, including advice on business organisation and economic consultancy; consulting in business organisation, namely support of partnership projects and of reorganisation processes; consultancy in the field of company management and restructuring; expert commercial appraisal services; drafting and development of strategy plans in connection with company management; market research and analysis; opinion polling; commercial management of projects; coaching (consultancy relating to business and commerce); consulting in relation to business policy; consulting relating to company management | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Practical training, courses, workshops and training sessions, in particular relating to management of projects and programmes as well of information systems | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design of information systems; programming of information systems; services relating to automation; services of IT specialists and computer experts; design and development of software, including software for data banks and consulting in the field; computer programming for electronic information processing; installation of software; updating and maintenance of software; design and development of process controls; design and development of computer systems and of software; development of networks; consultancy on the use of computer (network) hardware and software (automation services); consultancy in research leading to development of software; designing, updating, adapting and installing computer programs and consulting in the field; services provided by engineers; information and consulting relating to the above services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 19, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |