USPTO serial 79057732
MANK GALLERY THE FINE ART OF TABLE SETTINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3737067Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 12, 2010
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MANK GALLERY THE FINE ART OF TABLE SETTINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
56307 Harschbach, DE
56307 Harschbach, DE
DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper, cardboard; goods made of paper or cellulose paper, namely, table cloths, doilies, drip catchers in the nature of table mats and spouts for catching drips from beverages containers, holders for small cans, covers for drinking vessels as a protection of the drinks against mud and insects, egg cosies, napkins of paper; sanitary napkin bags of paper, bibs made of paper for children, inlays in the nature of liners of paper for soap boxes, streak-free paper towels for lavatory cleaning, coverings of paper for bolster, shoe cleaning gloves of paper, tissues of paper for removing make-up in the nature of make-up pads, paper and cardboard inlays for packages, paper inlays for telephones as noise attenuator, all aforementioned goods are also in wedge-shaped, self-adhesive as well as in impressed and printed form | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | foam rubber materials used in manufacturing parts of coasters, dollies, drip catchers, holders for small cans, egg cosies, napkin holders, napkin bag holders, bibs of foam rubber for children; foam rubber materials used in manufacturing inlays in the nature of rubber pads for soap boxes, streak-free sponges for lavatory cleaning, coverings for bolster, shoe cleaning stripes, shoe cleaning rags, shoe cleaning gloves, tissues for removing make-up in the nature of make-up foams, foam rubber containers for liquids in the nature of ink, foam rubber inlay for packages, foam rubber inlay for telephones as noise attenuator, foam rubber damping rings for steering columns of vehicle | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | textile goods, namely, cotton fabric, non-woven goods, in particular table linen, tablecloth of textiles, place mats not of paper; punching articles made of fleece, including air-laid fleece, namely, fleece fabric used for manufacturing table cloth, placemats, coasters, doilies, drip catchers, holders for small cans, covers for drinking vessels, egg cosies, napkins, napkin bags, bibs for children, inlays in the nature of pads for soap-boxes, coverings for bolster, shoe cleaning gloves, tissues for removing make-up in the nature of make-up pods, inlays for packages, inlays for telephones as noise attenuator | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mank GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Mank GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Mank GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named MANK GALLERY THE FINE ART OF TABLE SETTINGS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 18, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |