USPTO serial 79057737
SIGN-WARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIGN-WARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret Polson
Carl Oppedahl Oppedahl Patent Law Firm LLCP O Box 5940Dillon, CO 80435-5940UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Frames for hanging and displaying tarpaulins on walls, ceilings, floors, and other surfaces, elements for connecting and coupling frames, namely, suspension adapters, mounting corners, tension rods, clamps, tubes and rods, rail connectors and caps, tensioning devices for hanging and displaying tarpaulins, namely, suspension adapters, mounting corners, tension rods, metal clamps, metal tubes and rods, rail connectors and caps, all the aforesaid goods of metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Mechanical drives for stretching tarpaulins | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Frames for hanging and displaying tarpaulins on walls, ceilings, floors, and other surfaces, elements for connecting and coupling frames, namely, suspension adapters, mounting corners, tension rods, clamps, tubes and rods, rail connectors and caps, tensioning devices for hanging and displaying tarpaulins, namely, suspension adapters, mounting corners, tension rods, metal clamps, metal tubes and rods, rail connectors and caps, all the aforesaid goods not of metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Room dividers, folding screens, display boards, mobile presentation and advertising display boards | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | Ropes, tarpaulins, elements to establish cord edges being weltings, namely, welding adhesives and sealing strips | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SIGN-WARE GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named SIGN-WARE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |