USPTO serial 79057806
EMERY FINEST TISSUE-HOTEL-PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3740149Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 19, 2010
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMERY FINEST TISSUE-HOTEL-PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | goods made of paper or cellulose, included in this class, in particular paper table covers, paper tray doilies, paper place mats, paper doilies, paper table linen and paper table cloths; coasters made of paper, in particular for glasses and carafes; place mats, made of paper, drip catchers in the nature of mat and spouts made of paper for catching drips from beverage containers; paper covers for drinking vessels, for cup handles, for holding drink cans, dishes, drinking glasses, drinking beakers, wine glasses, beer glasses, drinking vessels, toothbrush glasses, beverage cans; table napkins of paper; table napkins adopted for use as a cover for cutlery, made of paper; bibs for children and adults, made of paper; paper liners for soap boxes; beer coaster, made of paper, printed paper strips for advertising purposes for attachment to drinking glass; cream containers, made of paper and sold empty; tissues of paper or removing make-up; ink reservoirs; paper or cardboard packaging materials, included ink reservoirs in this class, namely, cardboard packaging, paper bags for packaging; packing for bottles, made of cardboard and paper; paper bags for packaging: protective covers of paper for packaging | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | cloths for cleaning lavatories; shoe sponges, shoe cleaning cloths, shoe cleaning rags, shoe cleaning gloves, coasters, not of paper and other than table linen; drip catchers in the nature of mats or of a spout-top, not of paper, for catching drips from beverages or beverage containers, drip catchers for glasses and for cans not of paper; dishes for soap; cream jugs; napkin rings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | textiles and textile goods included in this class, in particular table linen, table cloths, place mats; textile table covers, textile place mats and textile table napkins, not of paper, table napkins adapted for use as a cover for cutlery, not made of paper; articles made of fleece materials, in particular table covers, tray doilies, place mats, doilies, table linen and table cloth; covers for drinking vessels, drinking glasses, beverage cans, drinking beakers or other drinking vessels, made of textiles; pillowcases for bolsters; tissue of textile for removing make-up | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 026 | Egg cosies | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of materials, in particular printing of samples, printing, lithographic printing, offset printing, stencil printing, treatment of paper | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mank GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Mank GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Mank GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named EMERY FINEST TISSUE-HOTEL-PRODUCTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 3, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |