USPTO serial 79057832
LFX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LFX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Silver ornaments; bracelets (jewellery, jewelry (Am.)); brooches (jewellery, jewelry (Am.)); necklaces (jewellery, jewelry (Am.)); jewellery; statues of precious metal; rings (jewellery, jewelry (Am.)); works of art of precious metal; earrings; silver arts and crafts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |