Drawing for NANOFLEX

USPTO serial 79057835

NANOFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3689540Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 29, 2009
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JONATHAN MYERS

JONATHAN MYERS K.F. ROSS, P.C.5683 RIVERDALE AVENUE, BOX 900CUSTOMER NUMBER 535BRONX, NY 10471-0900

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019non-metal building materials, namely, universal plastic tubes and pipes coated with a layer of nanoparticles of metal, and a transparent top adhesive sealing layer for plumbing, heating and constructionSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2019UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 25, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 25, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 9, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 11, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 6, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 6, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 28, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 22, 2011LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 22, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 24, 2010LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 12, 2010LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 3, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 29, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 9, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 29, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 29, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 28, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 28, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2008RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Oct 25, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance