USPTO serial 79057849
LOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3885475Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 7, 2010
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
13403 Berlin, DE
13403 Berlin, DE
13403 Berlin, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Confectionery, namely, candy, chocolates, chocolate chips, fruit gums, chewing gums, lollipops; chocolate products, namely, chocolate powder and chocolate syrup; pastries, ice-cream; preparations for making the aforementioned products, namely, cocoa powder and sugar | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 29, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |