Drawing for P PATRICK

USPTO serial 79057852

P PATRICK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with P PATRICK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, footwear, headgear, sports clothes, trakcsuits, tights, sports footwear, training footwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
028Games, toys, gymnastics apparatus and sports not included in other classes, balloons; decorations for Christmas treesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 6, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 15, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 18, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 18, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 18, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 24, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 24, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 17, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 25, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance