USPTO serial 79057854
ROBADUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 1, 2009
- Examiner
- HABEEB, MYRIAH A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ROBADUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Röchling LERIPA Papertech GmbH & Co. KG
Oepping, AT
Other trademarks owned by Röchling LERIPA Papertech GmbH & Co. KG
Röchling LERIPA; Papertech GmbH & Co. KG
AT
Other trademarks owned by Röchling LERIPA; Papertech GmbH & Co. KG
Röchling LERIPA; Papertech GmbH & Co. KG
AT
Other trademarks owned by Röchling LERIPA; Papertech GmbH & Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
JOHN ALUMIT ALUMIT IP135 South Jackson Street, Suite 200Glendale, CA 91205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Pickers for weaving looms, namely, a device used for shooting bobbins from one side of the fabric to the other; and stamp blocks made of plastics to punch shapes out of a fabric; ] parts and accessories for paper making machines, namely, plates for paper machines, bars for suction boxes for paper machines, bars for Fourdrinier tables for paper machines, drainage foils for paper machines, suction boxes for felts for paper machines, roller felts for machines for making paper, cardboard, cellulose and for dewatering, felts for suction boxes and Fourdrinier tables for paper machines, scrapers for cleaning paper machines, rollers and other cylinders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Röchling LERIPA Papertech GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Röchling LERIPA; Papertech GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Röchling LERIPA; Papertech GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named ROBADUR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 16, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PBPR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - ESU SUPERVISOR REQUEST | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |