Drawing for ICEBAND

USPTO serial 79057928

ICEBAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICEBAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medical bandages for compression, cooling and heating purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
010Orthopedic articles for compression, cooling and heating purposes, namely, elastic bandages, orthopedic knee bandages, orthopedic shoulder bandages, orthopedic ankle bandages, anatomical bandages for jointsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 20, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 11, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 15, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 23, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 25, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 23, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 12, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 12, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 1, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance