USPTO serial 79057970
TRISCAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3787534Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 2010
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRISCAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Seiter
William J. Seiter Seiter Legal Studio2500 Broadway, Bldg F, Suite F-125Santa Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal belt pulleys; metal hose couplings for use with metal hoses; metal hose clamps; industrial metal hose and metal tubing, and hose connectors, namely metal hose clamps, metal clips for metal hoses, metal hose couplings and metal hose fittings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Automotive fan belts for engines; timing belts for engines of automotives; caps for vehicle radiators; belt tensioner for automotive timing belts and fan belts for automotive engines; pulleys, being parts of engines; closure caps for radiators, closure caps for automotive cooling radiators; fuel pumps for land vehicles, fuel injection apparatus in the nature of electronic fuel injection modules for engines and carburettors; water pumps for automotives; alternators for automotive engines; valves being parts of machines; catalytic converters for engine exhausts; compressed air pumps, water pumps for automotives; pneumatic grease guns | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electronic apparatus for causing signal indicators to flash, namely signal flashers in the nature of flashing safety lights; thermostats for automotives; batteries, battery chargers; cable jump leads; on-board navigation apparatus for vehicles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Power transmission belts for land vehicles; valves for vehicle tires; steering system components for automotives in the nature of outer tie rods, ball-axial joints; suspension systems for automotive ball joints, wishbones, stabilizer links, strut mounts, bushings, and components therefore, namely, shock absorbers being automobile parts, coli springs being land vehicle suspension parts; brakes for vehicles, braking systems for vehicles and parts for braking systems; clutch for land vehicles and clutch components, namely, brake shoes, pads, hydraulic brake pads discs, clutch cables, and brake calipers for land vehicles; gas caps for land vehicles fuel tanks; idler arms, being parts of vehicles; wheel sprockets for land vehicles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Non-metal vehicle radiator hose for use in automotives; non-metal hydraulic hose made of rubber; pipe gaskets | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Triscan A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Triscan A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Triscan A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named TRISCAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 12, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |