Drawing for NPS

USPTO serial 79057988

NPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L. Dean

Jennifer L. Dean Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP1500 K Street, N.W.Suite 1100Washington, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific apparatus and instruments for particle characterization analysis, namely, particle size analyzers, particle size distribution analyzers, particle shape analyzers, aggregate particle structure analyzers, particle aspect ratio analyzers, aggregate particle compactness analyzers, zeta potential analyzers, and molecular weight analyzersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 2, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 12, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 25, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2009MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 2009ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 23, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 28, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 23, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 9, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance