CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for IMPERATIVE

USPTO serial 79058072

IMPERATIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4192380Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2012
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMPERATIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas M. Galgano, Esq.

Thomas M. Galgano, Esq. Galgano & Associates, PLLC20 W. Park Avenue, Suite 204Long Beach, NY 11561UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033VODKASECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 10, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 21, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 6, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 24, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 20, 2012MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 11, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 11, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2011CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 13, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 11, 2011RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 17, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 17, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 14, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 13, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 8, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 25, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 23, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 10, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance