USPTO serial 79058140
DIMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3761388Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 16, 2010
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with DIMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DIMES GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIR KETI
TOKAT, TR
Other trademarks owned by DIMES GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIR KETI
DIMES GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by DIMES GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
DIMES GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by DIMES GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph L. Morales
Joseph L. Morales The Morales Law Firm6628 Walnutwood Cir.Baltimore, MD 21212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Meat, fish; Dry legumes; Ready soups; preserved olives; Milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Edible vegetable oils; sesame oil, Eggs; Potato chips ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | [ Coffee, cocoa; beverages with chocolate base, namely, chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; Macaronis, noodles; Honey, propolis, namely, bee glue for human consumption; Spices; Yeasts; flour, processed semolinas, food starches; Sugar powder, cube sugar, confectionery sugar, namely, crystal sugar pieces; Teas, ice teas; Candies for food, chocolates, biscuits, crackers, wafers; Salt ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | [ Beers; Mineral waters, spring waters, table waters, soda waters; ] Vegetable juices as beverages; fruit juices [ ; syrups for making beverages, namely, for making vegetable and fruit beverages ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIMES GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIR KETI
- Other trademarks owned by DIMES GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by DIMES GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named DIMES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 10, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 29, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |