USPTO serial 79058142
DYNAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Air treatment units in the nature of air cleaning units; axial fans for use in air ventilation systems for industrial and commercial use; helicoidal fans, namely, wall axial fans for industrial and commercial use; centrifugal fans for use with heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems; ventilation equipment, namely, roof fans; mixed-flow fans for use with ventilating systems; helico-centrifugal fans for use with ventilating systems; box fans for use with ventilating systems; domestic, civil and industrial fans incorporating speed regulators for use in the ventilation of air; ceiling fans; convector heaters; fan assisted convector heaters; air conditioning machines, namely, air conditioning units; refrigeration machines; heating installations; centrifugal roof extractors for chimneys being extractor hoods, ventilation exhaust fans; air purifiers; air humidifiers; electric heating fans; cooling fan systems for wall ovens; electric fans; electric fans for household air conditioning; electric window fans; portable electric fans; ventilating exhaust fans; shutters and grills being part of electric fans | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 1, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |