Drawing for MARLIES DEKKERS UNDRESSES

USPTO serial 79058164

MARLIES DEKKERS UNDRESSES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARLIES DEKKERS UNDRESSES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Undershirts, pants, underpants, swim wear, skirts, blouses, bras, bathing suits, tights, dresses, gloves, underwear, pyjamas, leotards, stockings, hosiery, suspender belts; lingerieSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 24, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 7, 2016LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 4, 2016RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 22, 2013RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 4, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 11, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 31, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 10, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance