Drawing for IEVO

USPTO serial 79058226

IEVO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3619619Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 12, 2009
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IEVO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Seiter

WILLIAM J. SEITER SEITER & CO.220 26TH ST STE 202SANTA MONICA, CA 90402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for industrial and scientific purposes; fire extinguishing compositions; hydrogenSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
003Cleaning preparations, automobile cleaners; cleaning, polishing and scouring preparations; soaps for household useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
004Oils and greases for industrial purposes; automotive and industrial lubricants; engine fuels and lighting fuels; fuel pellets; fuel oil; fuel gas; candles and wicks for candlesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
029Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats, and also ready-made meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; edible oils and fats, namely, vegetable oils and palm oilSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour, bread, pastry; flavoured ices, iceSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
031Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products and grains, namely sugar cane, fresh maize, fresh corn, unprocessed soy beans, rapeseed being sowing seeds, natural plants and trees, namely, jatropha, mahua, mustard, flax, sunflower, hemp, field pennycress and algaeSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
036Electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of payments for purchase of carbon dioxide (C02) emissions quotasSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Maintenance and repair of vehicles; car washSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, carbon dioxide (CO2) emission calculation and research and design relating to transportation fuels; design and development of computer hardware and softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
043Services for providing food and drinkSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 6, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 6, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 31, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 13, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 15, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 6, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 6, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 24, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 24, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 7, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance