USPTO serial 79058598
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Advice relating to the development of computer systems, advisory services relating to computer hardware, computer software, computer systems analysis, computer systems design and the acquisition of computer software, and advisory services relating to man-machine interfaces for computer software related thereto for legal services, the financial services industry, the construction industry and the information technology industry | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |