Drawing for DIVINO

USPTO serial 79058619

DIVINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIVINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; animal skins, hides; trunks and travelling bags; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips, harness and saddlerySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Footwear, namely, slippers, boots, sandals, sports shoes, lace boots and parts thereof; shoe parts namely heelpieces; heels; footwear uppers; stockings; belts, braces, gartersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 8, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 3, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 11, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 28, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 30, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 30, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance