USPTO serial 79058788
ROOMMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROOMMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |