USPTO serial 79058789
BOLIFOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3784889Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 4, 2010
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOLIFOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FI
FI
FI
Helsinki, FI
FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ginabeth B. Hutchison
Ginabeth B. Hutchison Alston & Bird LLP1201 W. Peachtree StreetAtlanta, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products for agriculture, primarily for animal husbandry, namely, mineral ingredients; chemical additives for use in the manufacture of animal feed, feedstuffs and drinking water; chemical food supplements for agricultural products, namely, organic minerals for animal feed and feedstuffs; microbiological chemical additives for use in the manufacture of animal feed, feedstuffs and drinking water other than for medical and veterinary use; and chemical and microbiological products in the nature of chemicals and chemical additives for hygienic and environmental improvement intended for application to animal excreta and litter and for treating hazardous waste in buildings and equipment | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Feed products for animals, namely, non-medicated animal feed; and feedstuffs for animals, namely, non-medicated animal feed additives, minerals and inorganic phosphates for nonnutritional purposes for use as ingredients | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Yara Phosphates Oy
- Other trademarks owned by Yara Phosphates Oy
- Other trademarks owned by Yara Suomi OY
- Other trademarks owned by Yara Phosphates Oy
- Other trademarks owned by Kemira Phosphates Oy
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named BOLIFOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | Further Decision Processed by IB | — | |
| Feb 25, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 2, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2022 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 4, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 18, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |