USPTO serial 79058797
CSA CZECH AIRLINES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3746929Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 9, 2010
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- —
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CSA CZECH AIRLINES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CZ-160 08 Praha 6, CZ
CZ-160 08 Praha 6, CZ
CZ
Praha 6, Vokovice, CZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Jennings
Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP1200 Seventeenth Street, NWWashington, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Transport by air; Transport of goods; Transport of passengers; Transport of valuables; Packaging goods for transportation; Storage of goods; Travel arrangements, namely, arranging travel tours, travel excursions and cruise arrangements | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | [ Providing of training in the field of transport activities, namely, air transport of goods, transport of valuables, packaging goods for transportation, airline security; Entertainment, sporting and cultural activities, namely, in-flight entertainment in the nature of providing pre-recorded motion pictures for passengers to view during flight, providing pre-recorded radio programs and other musical recordings for passengers during flight ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | [ Providing of food and drink; Providing temporary accommodation ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ceské aerolinie a.s.
- Other trademarks owned by Ceské aerolinie a.s.
- Other trademarks owned by Smartwings, a.s.
- Other trademarks owned by Ceské aerolinie a.s.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CSA CZECH AIRLINES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | IROP | IRREGULARITY ON NOTICE OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 9, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |