Drawing for BAZE

USPTO serial 79058844

BAZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3669569Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 18, 2009
Examiner
KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Sacoff

Robert W. Sacoff Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geralds200 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 2900Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for providing real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interfaceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 1, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 7, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 21, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 25, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 25, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 8, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 3, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 3, 2009LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 18, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 18, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 2, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 7, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 13, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 8, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 23, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 23, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance