Drawing for FAJR

USPTO serial 79058932

FAJR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3728523Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 22, 2009
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FAJR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas R. Wolf

Douglas R. Wolf Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036financial services, namely, financial advice, consultation and planning; banking services and banking consultation services; investment services, namely, investment advice, brokerage and management; financing of business and commercial acquisitions; financial management services, namely, asset management, fund management and wealth management services and advice; insurance services, namely, insurance agency services, insurance information and consultancy, insurance brokerageSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 15, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 20, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 29, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 29, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 29, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 11, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 22, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 6, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 1, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 20, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 17, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance