Drawing for AIRTEC

USPTO serial 79058936

AIRTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3689561Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 29, 2009
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard B. Biagi

Richard B. Biagi Neal & McDevitt LLC1776 Ash StreetNorthfield, IL 60093

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Air intake components and parts for vehicles, namely, snorkels, snorkel bodies, filters for snorkels, air rams for snorkels, brackets for snorkels, connecting tubes and tube clamps for snorkelsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 16, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 29, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 31, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 9, 2015EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2015PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Aug 25, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 24, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 29, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 30, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 10, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 17, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance