Drawing for NOOVO

USPTO serial 79058967

NOOVO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TOOLEY, DAVID E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOOVO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising; business management; business administration; office functionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
038TelecommunicationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 16, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 22, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 10, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 7, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 21, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 21, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance