Drawing for AXTENSION

USPTO serial 79058980

AXTENSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3689562Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 29, 2009
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with AXTENSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Krista Weber Powell

Krista Weber Powell TRASKBRITT, P.C.230 South 500 East, Suite 300Salt Lake City, UT 84102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, ERP, Enterprise Resource Planning software for the purpose of optimizing the use of other softwareACTIVE—
042consultation services, namely, software design, development and implementation; design and development of softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 8, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 29, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 29, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 16, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 28, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 29, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 11, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 21, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 30, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 17, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance