Drawing for OXX

USPTO serial 79059004

OXX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3763310Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 23, 2010
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OXX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Loudspeakers for surround sound systems, in-car entertainment systems, namely, portable DVD players with TFT Screen; portable audio and video players; digital video cameras, MP3 players, DAB radio receiversSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 20, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 28, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 30, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 28, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 28, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 8, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 23, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 18, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 1, 2010LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 28, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 1, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 23, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 20, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 31, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 22, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 24, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance