Drawing for FLORENSIS FINEST FAVORITES

USPTO serial 79059050

FLORENSIS FINEST FAVORITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLSEN, EMILY K
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLORENSIS FINEST FAVORITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031PLANT CUTTINGSSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 15, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 30, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 9, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 14, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 24, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 24, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance