USPTO serial 79059069
LUTZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUTZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture, mirrors, frames; goods (included in this class) made of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum, substitutes for all these materials or of plastics | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Household or kitchen utensils and containers (neither of precious metal nor coated therewith); unworked or semi-worked glass (except building glass); glassware, porcelain and earthenware(included in this class) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Fabrics and textiles (included in this class); bed and table covers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising for third parties retail and wholesale services with respect to electrical household and/or kitchen apparatus, household and/or kitchen apparatus, machines for working wood, metal, stone and plastics, as well as for wood, metal, stone and plastics processing, electrically operated tools and apparatus, apparatus for lighting, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating and sanitary purposes, paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, furniture, mirrors, picture frames, goods (included in class 20) of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plastics, glassware, porcelain and earthenware, textiles and textile goods, bed and table covers, clothing, footwear and headgear, lace and embroidery, ribbons and braid, artificial flowers, carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum and other materials for covering existing floors, wall hangings, games and playthings, gymnastic and sporting articles, decorations for Christmas trees, namely the bringing together of these goods (except their transports) for the benefit of others, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase said goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 26, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 26, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |