USPTO serial 79059111
GEOPEPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3676662Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 1, 2009
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GEOPEPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
K. BRADFORD ADOLPHSON,
K. BRADFORD ADOLPHSON, WARE, FRESSOLA, VAN DER SLUYS & ADOLPHSO755 MAIN ST., P.O. BOX 224BRADFORD GREEN, BUILDING FIVEMONROE, CT 06468Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, data transmission of voice and multimedia content to mobile phones and other wireless devices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |