Drawing for CENTEX

USPTO serial 79059127

CENTEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3663878Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 4, 2009
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CENTEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Goehring

Jeffrey M. Goehring Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, in particular ball millsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jan 21, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 21, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 6, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 4, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 29, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 18, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2010FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 4, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 4, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 19, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 29, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 15, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 12, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 24, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance